Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and potential uncertainties arising from the possibility of the U.S. withdrawing troops from Europe, the U.K. unveiled a revamped defense strategy on Monday.

British Prime Minister announced plans to bolster the nation’s “war-fighting readiness” through substantial investments in areas such as submarine construction (12 submarines), weapons and munitions production, artificial intelligence, and, notably, nuclear deterrence.

This announcement followed a Strategic Defense Review, conducted by an independent board, which highlighted areas needing improvement within the U.K. to effectively deter aggressors like , as well as North Korea, Iran, and China.

Beyond defense readiness enhancements, the review emphasized the importance of strengthening societal resilience and support.

“Our response must extend beyond increased defense spending,” Starmer stated in a report. “We need a fundamental shift in mindset to prioritize security and defense, making it the core organizing principle of government.”

The document released by the British government on Monday outlined a new defense strategy aimed at addressing threats deemed “more serious and less predictable than at any time since the Cold War.”

A key element of the U.K.’s defense overhaul is a nearly $20.3 billion investment in its nuclear warhead program, intended to enhance its deterrence capabilities and send “the ultimate warning to anyone who seeks to do us harm,” according to the report.

This initiative is characterized as a “NATO first” policy, prioritizing the immediate threats posed by Russia to Europe. However, it is not intended to be a “NATO only” policy.

The U.K. aims to produce a new submarine every 18 months, ultimately building a fleet of up to 12 nuclear-powered attack submarines under the , a trilateral security pact with Australia and the U.S. focused on Indo-Pacific security and stability, particularly in response to China’s growing assertiveness in the region.

Defense Secretary John Healey stated, “We are in a new era of threat, which demands a new era for U.K. defense.”

Starmer initiated the review last summer, soon after assuming his leadership position.

Security experts have cautioned that the threat posed by Russia’s advancing military capabilities is a long-term concern that will likely persist beyond the Ukraine conflict or even a , prompting European nations to adapt to this new reality.

The potential re-election of Trump presents another challenge for European leaders.

While Trump previously urged leaders to increase defense spending, most nations did not meet their NATO GDP defense spending commitments until after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Currently, eight of the 32 NATO members are below the 2% GDP spending target, while five, including the U.S., exceed 3%.

NATO members have increasingly advocated for increased defense spending and greater independence from the .

While the aims to allocate 2.5% of its GDP to defense by 2027, increasing to 3% by 2030, Trump has proposed a 5% target for NATO nations, though the alliance has not agreed to this, and the U.S. itself falls short, spending 3.38% according to 2024 data.

The U.K. seeks to assume a more prominent leadership role within NATO, especially given concerns about the U.S.’s reliability amid the conflict in Russia and Trump’s threats to reduce troop presence in Europe.

“`