Microsoft’s introduction of a “community-first” AI infrastructure strategy this week was far from a typical corporate statement.

At a high-profile event near Washington D.C., Microsoft vice chair Brad Smith detailed five major pledges to tackle waning community support for new data centers. These commitments involve paying higher electricity rates to prevent consumer cost hikes and creating local employment opportunities. The news was significant enough that President Trump praised it in a social media post beforehand, attributing the action to his administration’s involvement.

“The reality is, infrastructure projects advance only when communities believe the advantages exceed the drawbacks,” Smith stated on Tuesday. “It must be founded on trust.”

Primarily, the announcement highlights the intensifying backlash against these resource-heavy data centers, particularly concerning electricity prices. Over the past year, U.S. government data shows consumer electricity costs have risen at over double the pace of overall inflation.

To finance the infrastructure needed for data centers, utility companies have launched extensive expansions in power generation, transmission, and distribution networks. As data centers are developed, utilities start recouping their infrastructure expenses from their wider customer base—reinforcing the view that households are underwriting AI development. In numerous areas, this leads to rising bills, angering consumers who are also voters.

Major technology firms, Microsoft included, have had to scale back certain projects due to increasing local resistance.

Reporting from Georgia last year revealed a split dynamic. Towns without data centers were eager to draw them in to boost tax revenue. Locations with several centers were implementing bans to prevent further construction. Furthermore, in last November’s general election, voters ousted some state officials responsible for electricity oversight because of soaring power costs.

Within months, this concern has escalated from a local political matter to a central issue in national politics before the upcoming midterm elections. For tech firms and data center builders, climbing electricity prices—along with other contentious factors like water consumption—are endangering their AI goals.

The scenario Smith outlined this week presents a nearly ideal alternative. He portrayed a comprehensive revival for towns, with data center tax revenue financing hospitals, schools, parks, and libraries. He pledged decades of construction employment as data centers establish and grow. He also assured that Microsoft’s collaborative efforts with utilities could prevent price surges for everyday consumers. Microsoft will fund certain utility upgrades and seek approval for its data centers to be charged premium rates.

Smith’s outlook somewhat recalled travels through the Permian Basin during the shale oil boom, a resurgent oil and gas region in West Texas and New Mexico. There, remarkable public facilities are financed by state and local oil taxes combined with corporate charity. This social compact enables oil companies to drill rapidly while maintaining local satisfaction—at least during prosperous periods.

However, such agreements develop gradually through experimentation. In many oil and gas areas, the industry and communities evolved concurrently, with residents moving there for work.

On Thursday, American Petroleum Institute CEO Mike Sommers gave his counsel to the tech sector at a Washington energy gathering. “Companies must lead in this battle because currently, they are the new fracking,” Sommers remarked. “They need to take responsibility and begin explaining how their technologies genuinely help Americans.”

Smith recognizes the difficulties. “The advancement the future demands… must be based on trust, which is never created overnight,” he said. “It isn’t achieved merely by announcing a plan, [but] by making sure our actions align with our statements.”

That is the fundamental challenge. Trust requires years to build. Regarding data centers, the technology industry is starting at a disadvantage.

To receive this story in your inbox, subscribe to the TIME CO2 Leadership Report newsletter.

This story is supported by a partnership with Journalism Funding Partners. TIME is solely responsible for the content.